
Dissident Philosophy Forum welcome to the new culture |
|
| |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:07 am | |
| As I have said in other threads, I promote prostitution as a means by which men can increase their choices.
If you live in an english-speaking nation, you don't have many choices as a man. Usually, your choice is already decided for you. You have the option to "hook up" with a nice girl from your workplace, only if she chooses you first. If you don't mind being treated like a like dog who is selected from an auction block by his female masters, then you can be satisfied by this situation.
For those of you not satisfied with post-feminist society and you actually want to see your preferences catered to, paying for sex as a service will widen your array of choices. Furthermore, if you allow your horizon to extend overseas, your options will become unimaginably large. There are adventures to be found that you cannot even imagine.
Paying for sex is not a utopia. It has a different set of problems than the ones encountered in the three-ring circus of dating jealous single women. This kind of business is never very far from organized crime -- so dangers are present. Caution is achieved with solidarity among those who travel. We can keep each other safe by keeping each other informed. Working together will empower all of us.
|
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:18 am | |
| |
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:15 am | |
| Yes, freaks like this degenerate weakling, love leaving their countries to exploit poor desperate children in third-world places.
It's what gives them "dignity". An ugly fuck exploiting the desperation of the poor.
By the way, freak, everyone pays for sex, one way or another, but it is only those inferior males that must pay for sex with females that would fuck just about anything for a buck. |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:11 am | |
| When money is low, parents will sell their own children as sex slaves. Exploitation at its finest.
Old, balding, slimy men do love travelling to poor countries like Malaysia to get blowjobs from 3 year olds in back alleys for a coke. How convenient. Everyone wins. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:33 am | |
| Neither one of you have responded to what I have posted. You are strawmanning this subject. And you are using very popular stereotypes to demonize your strawman. The fat hairy molestor of little princess is exactly the imagery that is commonly and popularly used to demonize prostitution and support your very bizarre, religious laws in your own nation.
|
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:02 am | |
| No strawmanning here. I don't care who you are or what you look like, child prostitution is disgusting; it's exploitation, slavery, and abuse. Little girls ought to be little girls for as long as god so help the guardians who allow them.
I once met a 14 year old girl who was sold by her parents for crack. She was broken beyond repair, looking for anyone to love her...
cutting herself...
sleeping with a slew of men in gangs for weeks at a time...
she was so lost, and her body was so pretty...yet she damaged it at every turn because she had no self worth...
I am not in any way religious, and I don't need to be to see that it is not right for a child to be taken advantage of by the scum of the earth so that they can pay the rest of their lives for it.
|
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:39 am | |
| Trafficking is part of what some gangs do. The story you are making up again to build another strawman is someone who was trafficked. I never suggested anything about trafficking - but I share your concern about it. Bad things happen to people all over the world. I would point out that what was happening to your friend would be equally bad for an adult.
In any case, you are talking to the wrong person. You could always contact some of the people in my links provided, and tell them that they are "exploited, abused, slaves". The problem is that many of them go through great lengths to avoid being discovered. The so-called "Slaves" would be hiding from the very people who are allegedly trying to save them.
|
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:49 am | |
| A prostitute old enough to make the decision to sell their bodies is their business...
Of course that doesn't take from the fact that they're used like human trash. What you let yourself become is what you ultimately are....
Exploit away. |
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:51 am | |
| Freak, why do you avoid offering a cut-off age, but prefer the 16? whee I am from, you freak, 16 IS a legal age.
But you are talking of more, are you not?
So, what is it: 5? Is 3 a good age of consent?
Where does a feeble-minded Rusky draw the line? You give me an age.
|
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:47 pm | |
| | neti wrote: |
i was surprised by satyrs views here -- why talk about paedophilia. | I'm not surprised by your surprise.
Are you defending weakness?
Allow me to answer your question:
1- Why not attack pedophilia? Is there some rule that protects these mutants from the usual ravages of nature? Am I not an agent of nature; am I not as Satyr?
2- When hunting one singles out the weakest in a herd, first. it is the path-of-least-resistance. This cow reeks of vulnerability, amongst many others here, but his odor is particularly strong. He is easy.
3- I have a particular distaste for bullies. I am the bully of bullies. What bigger bully can there be than one preying on the weakest of the weak: children?
Any more questions?
|
|  | | yigaar
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:08 pm | |
| | Satyr wrote: | | neti wrote: |
i was surprised by satyrs views here -- why talk about paedophilia. | I'm not surprised by your surprise.
Are you defending weakness?
Allow me to answer your question:
1- Why not attack pedophilia? Is there some rule that protects these mutants from the usual ravages of nature? Am I not an agent of nature; am I not as Satyr?
2- When hunting one singles out the weakest in a herd, first. it is the path-of-least-resistance. This cow reeks of vulnerability, amongst many others here, but his odor is particularly strong. He is easy.
3- I have a particular distaste for bullies. I am the bully of bullies. What bigger bully can there be than one preying on the weakest of the weak: children?
Any more questions?
|
well - i am NOT talking or justifying paedophilia NOR is it my taste.... some odd sexed up 13 yr old may excite me occasionally but i wouldnt try anything with her. puberty is the age that nature imposed....except when kids dress up in a manner which mimics maturity -- but natures programming can mostly discriminate .. so sorry i couldnt be the asshole you were looking for..lol
but i suppose you read what you wanted in order to post a response you wanted to give... ?? - was it active or passive ... ?
attack paedophilia, i think thats horrible ... but dont say a average girl in her right mind chooses to sell her services at a good price either out of a desire for wealth OR a pressing need not unnaturally imposed on her ,just a stroke of bad luck..- - that is her choice and there is no disrespect or humiliation involved..if she feels its bad she shouldnt do it - and if society and loudmouths like you DONT ACT to help them then you should not abuse and take away her livelihood... the taboo on sex is a remnant of long gone times.. where men BULLIED women into subjugation..and made them subservient ?? whats your take on that ? |
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:21 pm | |
| | Echo wrote: | When money is low, parents will sell their own children as sex slaves. Exploitation at its finest.
Old, balding, slimy men do love travelling to poor countries like Malaysia to get blowjobs from 3 year olds in back alleys for a coke. How convenient. Everyone wins. |
how many reality shows does the general public need for it to not become even more shrouded in secrecy among chronies worldwide?
and what do you think threatens everyone's trustworthiness, given the precarious state of the economy?
\!!
sometimes one must feel like in a tertiary level kindergarten on the loose, in innumerable forums. |
|  | | yigaar
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:34 pm | |
| | Satyr wrote: |
3- I have a particular distaste for bullies. I am the bully of bullies. What bigger bully can there be than one preying on the weakest of the weak: children?
Any more questions?
|
you dont like Bullies --- the steak you eat , the cow didnt ask for it..she was forced into being your food...how do you justify that ? how do you justify eating any fruit seed vegetable..you had strength and you used it - you wish to be paid for your effort and lead a happy life..BUT you Bully poor animals into a tethered life against their will and chop them up ?? why ?
it is natural for heirarchies and the food chain is ok - but we as humans need to first ensure every plant and animal culled lived a good life - and were respected and treated as a life-form before killing them...we value our "other activites" soo much that we abuse other lives to derive greater joy for ourselves..-- make steaks and chicken cheap ! dont even let them walk around so feed = more meat ! - ... you sound like a man of action -- ACT ,.. or is it just a passtime. or your value system is to be applied selectively ? let meat be expensive - work harder for a good meal - the natural balance will be enforced and reduce pollution etc --
|
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:37 pm | |
| | neti wrote: |
but i suppose you read what you wanted in order to post a response you wanted to give... ?? - was it active or passive ... ? | You decide...this is a game.
| neti wrote: | | attack paedophilia, i think thats horrible ... but dont say a average girl in her right mind chooses to sell her services at a good price either out of a desire for wealth OR a pressing need not unnaturally imposed on her ,just a stroke of bad luck..- - that is her choice and there is no disrespect or humiliation involved..if she feels its bad she shouldnt do it - and if society and loudmouths like you DONT ACT to help them then you should not abuse and take away her livelihood... the taboo on sex is a remnant of long gone times.. | What is "loud" is that underlying crescendo of need.
Am I in a den of pedophiles? It would explain much.
Here is another take on your liberal crap: listening to degenerates pronounce themselves "lovers" of young girls, for the sake of THEIR orgasm, while these little girls tolerate their stench and endure their illness on them, is like killing a deer and then claiming that it enjoyed being killed by a formidable hunter such as you.
It is an attempt to justify one's behavior using the very principles one supposedly is indifferent to.
Why do not these pedophiles simply admit that they are taking advantage of the weak? Why do they clothe their sexual dysfunction with Christian finery and then pretend they are "advanced'?
And, most importantly, why do they deny me the "right" to respond to their needs with my own? They wish to rape little babies - genetically unfit and useless, but genetic mutations often produce such dead-ends - and i haver such a baby....then why deny me the same right to enjoy myself in response?
Or are you another fuckin' brown pussy?
| neti wrote: | where men BULLIED women into subjugation..and made them subservient ?? whats your take on that ? | A necessary part of civilization - a technology.
But if we are to return to primal states, giving females back their sexual power, then why not liberate men from this civilization's - ironically brought about by subjugating females - yolk?
Let's follow the logic through , brown man, and no selectively and arbitrarily choose our limits, because it suits us.
I have no problem with female having sexual choices, if she has no problem with me having the option of rape. I have no problem with a degenerate freak raping young children, if it has no problem with me castrating it. |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:02 pm | |
| | imp-pulse wrote: |
how many reality shows does the general public need for it to not become even more shrouded in secrecy among chronies worldwide?
and what do you think threatens everyone's trustworthiness, given the precarious state of the economy?
\!!
sometimes one must feel like in a tertiary level kindergarten on the loose, in innumerable forums. |
Do you ever write legibly?
It doesn't give you an air of wit-- you end up looking like a fucktarded yoda.
 |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:24 pm | |
| | neti wrote: | ultimate responsibility lies with the parents -- and the sin as well in such cases as above, and i pray no one suffers..but i beleive if i respect the girl and treat her as i would a friend there is no wrong - she lives a better life and i quell a god-given urge.. maybe she doesnt enjoy it..but she gets paid... this is especially true for developed countries.
if sex wouldnt have been taboo , much of the sickness could have been prevented. the amount of stress the taboo status causes is too much.. - prior days when symbiotic relations prevailed, men and women made a viable trade and guarding chastity ensured genes being passed on for men..hence the hullaballoo of virginity and honour!! ?? lol - not valid now!!
i wouldnt call myself a pervert -- would not fuck a poor child forced into prostitution - but i would gladly lay a beautiful girl who doesnt view sex as taboo and needs money .. she can fix her own price and choose customers and command respectable behaviour - or no deal .. where is the harm..and why is sex different from labour ?
i was surprised by satyrs views here -- why talk about paedophilia. |
I agree that prostitution (even for a teenage girl) can become a better alternative to being a cum bucket for a neighborhood of 20 niggas. It is sad that there are girls and young women in such a situation that their only option in life is to become a sexual exploit, but I'm not out to save the world; I'm not so naive...
It is equally sad that there are men and women who will never experience a mutual exchange of love...whether in a one-night stand or 10 year marriage... |
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:34 pm | |
| | Echo wrote: | | neti wrote: | ultimate responsibility lies with the parents -- and the sin as well in such cases as above, and i pray no one suffers..but i beleive if i respect the girl and treat her as i would a friend there is no wrong - she lives a better life and i quell a god-given urge.. maybe she doesnt enjoy it..but she gets paid... this is especially true for developed countries.
if sex wouldnt have been taboo , much of the sickness could have been prevented. the amount of stress the taboo status causes is too much.. - prior days when symbiotic relations prevailed, men and women made a viable trade and guarding chastity ensured genes being passed on for men..hence the hullaballoo of virginity and honour!! ?? lol - not valid now!!
i wouldnt call myself a pervert -- would not fuck a poor child forced into prostitution - but i would gladly lay a beautiful girl who doesnt view sex as taboo and needs money .. she can fix her own price and choose customers and command respectable behaviour - or no deal .. where is the harm..and why is sex different from labour ?
i was surprised by satyrs views here -- why talk about paedophilia. |
I agree that prostitution (even for a teenage girl) can become a better alternative to being a cum bucket for a neighborhood of 20 niggas. It is sad that there are girls and young women in such a situation that their only option in life is to become a sexual exploit, but I'm not out to save the world; I'm not so naive...
It is equally sad that there are men and women who will never experience a mutual exchange of love...whether in a one-night stand or 10 year marriage... |
do you ever intend to deal with victims, or simply state "facts" that should not concern you beyond an academic nimbus. |
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:37 pm | |
| | imp-pulse wrote: |
do you ever intend to deal with victims, or simply state "facts" that may should not concern you beyond an academic nimbus. | and there it is...the victim psychology of one siding with the prey rather than the predator.
The slave mind at work.
I wonder...how many of these 'innocent" victims would turn into aggressors if given a chance? History is full of examples. but this sheep wants to reserve the notion of its own purity...its whiter than white fleece, when it is caked in mud and its own feces. |
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:42 pm | |
| the fascho at work...
like beaten children becoming beating parents.
only that it's not about "beating". or was it? |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:44 pm | |
| |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:50 pm | |
| |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:40 pm | |
| I shouldn't have an expectation that women from post-feminist societies will understand this kind of business. And I shouldn't expect that men from white-picket fence neighborhoods should ever see reality the way I do. I think someone who is at age 20 might still think that the "way the world works" is that a boy and a girl are soulmates and so they get married and start a family. You could still be entertaining that after-school special plotline at age 20. When you get to be older you realize that is not the way the world works.
To elaborate on "post-feminist society". Women in those societies have an opportunity to have complete control over who they select to be the daddy of their babies. In some situations they are just queens selecting dogs off an auction block. Of course they will want to defend that lifestyle at all costs - as there are strategic reasons for doing so. Any kind of deviation from this paradigm will immediately be demonized by the them as some sort of organized gang rape.
|
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:52 pm | |
| Satyr is a very loud voice here who has a talent at completely distracting a thread. If we could put the pedophile theme on the back burner for just several minutes here. Even among adults - this topic about how men's sexual choices are going to be expanded; that topic has been completely sublimated as the trolls have derailed the conversation. It has been steamrolled by invective and acrimony.
Satyr is basically tearing into every poster on this forum in righteous indignation. He is depicting a world where men are like little dog playfriends who compete for the sexual attention from Female Masters -- wherein whatever little doggy boy gets the Master's favor is the "winner". Seriously here. Read his posts. That is precisely the paradigm from which he is lobbing his invective. Anyone who is promoting some other sociality for relating the sexes is deemed by him as some sort of degenerate genetic freak.
Within this thread, and many others, Satyr carries on an on about this weird universe of Alpha and subordinate males competing with their genetic traits for sexual favors from female masters. His little make-beleive universe is cartoonish in its conception. And what is more embarrasing is that he attacks people schizophrenically, as if that paradigm is somehow widely accepted by everyone here. (woops! It's not.)
I would suggest to you, Satyr, sir. That your endless trolling about weak and strong males and genetic superiority and inferiority. I would suggest to you that this constant anger is a way that you run in terror from the fact that your culture has reduced you to a little dog who begs for sex from liberated females. And when one of those liberated femme dommes says "Yes" to you, you congratulate yourself with a fake plastic trophy. This hurts you and you don't like to think about it. You have no choices anymore. And worse, you seem to love and protect the fact that you have no choices anymore.
Your anger is a means of sweeping your own feelings of inferiority under the rug. You make them go away. If you just get angry enough -- and yell enough -- you might forget how little options you have. If you yell enough, you might forget the fact that you are dog on a leash who does tricks for his Domme.
Just anger it away, Satyr. Yell it away. Yell at people until the hurtful feelings are drowned out. Go ahead. Have at it.
|
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:08 pm | |
| | Kuznetzova wrote: | I shouldn't have an expectation that women from post-feminist societies will understand this kind of business. And I shouldn't expect that men from white-picket fence neighborhoods should ever see reality the way I do. I think someone who is at age 20 might still think that the "way the world works" is that a boy and a girl are soulmates and so they get married and start a family. You could still be entertaining that after-school special plotline at age 20. When you get to be older you realize that is not the way the world works.
To elaborate on "post-feminist society". Women in those societies have an opportunity to have complete control over who they select to be the daddy of their babies. In some situations they are just queens selecting dogs off an auction block. Of course they will want to defend that lifestyle at all costs - as there are strategic reasons for doing so. Any kind of deviation from this paradigm will immediately be demonized by the them as some sort of organized gang rape.
|
these facts seem hardly arguable. so you can hide behind them.
our legal fraternity is barely awakening to the facts. political programs to boost "family" (values) cannot possibly meet these new paradigms.
social conflicts are on the rise, everywhere. total freedom required the total egotism: a fetish like the total global market as a regulation instrument for human output. some seem to have it all. that's worth more than any old-fashioned "gospel".
will you - in your talented style - elaborate more on "strategic reasons ...."?
but with a very different psychology under your belt than satyr. who would you like to communicate what to?
\!! |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:39 pm | |
| I'm aware of the alternatives. You seem to be the one approaching them as if they're new or revolutionary. I know it may come as a shocker, but I really don't give a fuck about who you fuck.
You also seem to think that the 'norm' should be prostitution's ostracized replacement. This idea of anything other than your 'alternative lifestyle' being unnatural feminist propaganda is not entirely true.
However, what is the case is that these courting activities, like females being the selectors, are completely evolutionary and crucial to proper breeding. I am a hitleress at heart. As I said before, women are hardwired to be snobby bitches....those who are not should be sterilized and are more fit for prostitution to be used by unselected men. I am actually for prostitution in that respect.
There are certainly many women who share the same sexually promiscuous preferences, and are not fit to be mothers in the first place.
I will grant you that society tries to fit all into equals with equal breeding rights and expectations that the general populace is not biologically inclined to meet. |
|  | | PolyValence

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:08 pm | |
| | Kuznetzova wrote: | I shouldn't have an expectation that women from post-feminist societies will understand this kind of business. And I shouldn't expect that men from white-picket fence neighborhoods should ever see reality the way I do. I think someone who is at age 20 might still think that the "way the world works" is that a boy and a girl are soulmates and so they get married and start a family. You could still be entertaining that after-school special plotline at age 20. When you get to be older you realize that is not the way the world works.
To elaborate on "post-feminist society". Women in those societies have an opportunity to have complete control over who they select to be the daddy of their babies. In some situations they are just queens selecting dogs off an auction block. Of course they will want to defend that lifestyle at all costs - as there are strategic reasons for doing so. Any kind of deviation from this paradigm will immediately be demonized by the them as some sort of organized gang rape.
|
I'm not sure that female sexual selection is alien to humans or the animal kingdom in general. What I mean is, a fair number of different species, including apes, seem to procreate based on female sexual selection. Displays of strength (Strength meaning whatever the female finds attractive, so not only physical strength, but call and colour coordination in some birds for example) by males are generally a way for females to judge which of them is more suitable for breeding with. The female may not have a conscious decision to make in this, but it is always for her favour that males perform mating rituals.
***
I mistakenly deleted my original response to you Echo, so this is a shorter, not quite as well written, response to:
| Echo wrote: | | However, what is the case is that these courting activities, like females being the selectors, are completely evolutionary and crucial to proper breeding |
I disagree about your use of the term "proper" when referring to breeding. What is evolutionary viable at one time isn't necessarily the case all the time - imagine a system where the variables are themselves variable when considered on a long enough time scale. Something being "completely evolutionary" doesn't mean that it is necessary to adhere to it forever - evolution is the changing state of play; meaning that female sexual selection as a dominant evolutionary mechanism is not necessarily contained within the conditions of "proper breeding", proper breeding being the successful production of offspring that are themselves able to reproduce if and when prerequisite conditions are met. I expect you know all of this, but your post seems to be a little reactionary.
Genetic Engineering is/could be "completely evolutionary" and do away with female sexual selection entirely, but this doesn't mean that it is proper, or that it is the only way to do things. |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:19 pm | |
| Females must be the more selective, especially due to gestation period and raising the young.
Men can produce enough sperm to fertilize a whole country with one orgasm, and impregnate whenever a fertile female is available. Women carry the burdens of reproduction, one womb, one egg; men could make many many children per day.
Being that there is a greater cost to the woman...men are not selective when it comes to mating...bonding and relationships, perhaps, but for the most part they aren't very picky.
Simply because a body type is more attractive does not mean he's going to want to mate with the most beautiful/fertile only...
Men get what they can...it's a gamble...and the reason for this is because women are the selectors and are typically choosy as to who is allowed mating privileges. |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:24 pm | |
| |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:32 pm | |
| Simply the fact that females are aroused/turned off by the scent of a particular male's pheromones in sweat is enough to tell you that the alpha theory is correct. Pheromones are based on the quality of said male's immune system and strong immune systems automatically make a male more attractive i.e. symmetrical/phi.
Women in the same household cycle together.
Harems for an alpha are simply default no matter what changes happen in society, and have happened for centuries.... we are like apes....
And we truly are reverting to the past....
Divorce rates are sky rocketing, lasting families are nearly non-existent, and the hippy free love has been a long ago liberation. Can't hide what lies beneath...
Last edited by Echo on Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:34 pm | |
| sex tourism the subject here?
nice excursions into methodical adaptation to educational elitism \!!
but hardly any original thought, much less interacive in the sense of long-forgotten ancestral records.
even satyrical echoes could be much more sophisticated. sure, saying this makes me the dunce, i know. |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:35 pm | |
| Good god old hag...
move on.... |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:45 pm | |
| This is now normal, popularized American television...
Of course he is strictly an alpha because of his material prosperity...
Genetically, he and his wives could all be very incompatible...
There is no telling of the mystery milkmen that could be in the picture...his latest wife does already have 3 children of her own that he is willing to care for which is the prime example of what these females would ideally like to accomplish...
secretly and instinctively.... |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:52 pm | |
| Hitler proposed that the government care for the eugenically selected breeds so that this wouldn't be a problem.... |
|  | | imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:56 pm | |
| | Echo wrote: | Good god old hag...
move on.... |
nope.
you given moderator status, having read tos, having anything to say except in that moody tone of a generation as disgusted as it is disgusting?
yeah, thus speak everybody's darlings, mercilessly spoilt and so "self-critical" at the same time.
\!!
oh, and a "hitlerist" position on genetics and possible engineering isn't what i need to accommodate here or anywhere in the net.
Last edited by imp-pulse on Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:01 pm | |
| You've followed me around looking for a cat fight since the day I started posting...
I think you've told me about 4-5 times now that I'm
a) unoriginal
b) nothing new under the sun
c) having nothing to say but childish, albeit repeated, jargon
I get it...
the question is....what do you have to offer other than bitching me out everywhere I go? |
|  | | Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:06 pm | |
| | Russian wrote: | | Satyr is a very loud voice here who has a talent at completely distracting a thread. If we could put the pedophile theme on the back burner for just several minutes here. Even among adults - this topic about how men's sexual choices are going to be expanded; that topic has been completely sublimated as the trolls have derailed the conversation. It has been steamrolled by invective and acrimony. | Russian , one more time....Give us an age where you think it is sick to have intercourse with a child.
Would you give an infant an orgasm ?
| Russian wrote: | | Satyr is basically tearing into every poster on this forum in righteous indignation. He is depicting a world where men are like little dog playfriends who compete for the sexual attention from Female Masters -- wherein whatever little doggy boy gets the Master's favor is the "winner". Seriously here. Read his posts. That is precisely the paradigm from which he is lobbing his invective. Anyone who is promoting some other sociality for relating the sexes is deemed by him as some sort of degenerate genetic freak. | Natural selection is a bitch, you .
That they would tolerate you for so long speaks to their own ailments.
It seems even Hitler would be acceptable as long as he didn't force them to take a look at themselves or to feel vulnerable.
This is what your Jewishness has created, . A world where no matter your degradation you are okay just as long as you don't bother anyone or you don't rock the boat of hedonistic conformity. Welcome to a post-modern nightmare, where after , we are being acclimatized to the idea that an old fuck can exploit an infant...and then?
Maybe animal sex is next because rights should be extended to ALL living organisms, right?
| Russian wrote: | | Within this thread, and many others, Satyr carries on an on about this weird universe of Alpha and subordinate males competing with their genetic traits for sexual favors from female masters. His little make-beleive universe is cartoonish in its conception. And what is more embarrasing is that he attacks people schizophrenically, as if that paradigm is somehow widely accepted by everyone here. (woops! It's not.) | Actually this is fun.
, you offer us all an age limit, if you have one.
[quote="Russian ]I would suggest to you, Satyr, sir. That your endless trolling about weak and strong males and genetic superiority and inferiority. I would suggest to you that this constant anger is a way that you run in terror from the fact that your culture has reduced you to a little dog who begs for sex from liberated females. And when one of those liberated femme dommes says "Yes" to you, you congratulate yourself with a fake plastic trophy. This hurts you and you don't like to think about it. You have no choices anymore. And worse, you seem to love and protect the fact that you have no choices anymore. [/quote]Oh little doggy, now we are hitting a bone.
| Russian wrote: | | Your anger is a means of sweeping your own feelings of inferiority under the rug. You make them go away. If you just get angry enough -- and yell enough -- you might forget how little options you have. If you yell enough, you might forget the fact that you are dog on a leash who does tricks for his Domme. | Anger, ? What you sense is the elevated heartbeat of a wolf out for the kill.
Little lamb, you are running now.
| Russian wrote: | | Just anger it away, Satyr. Yell it away. Yell at people until the hurtful feelings are drowned out. Go ahead. Have at it. | I live the image you've concocted, Russian I'm going to sip on my Porto waiting for you to offer us an age limit.
Then maybe you can tell us how you, can attract a pristine 16 year-old if she is not poor and desperate or mentally ill.
It certainly isn't your mind, dear boy. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:07 pm | |
| |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:13 pm | |
| | Satyr wrote: | I'm going to sip on my Porto waiting for you to offer us an age limit. |
Do you promise to hold your breath till she does so? |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:14 pm | |
| | Echo wrote: | Women in the same household cycle together.
Harems for an alpha are simply default no matter what changes happen in society, and have happened for centuries.... we are like apes....
|
The research on menstruation could also be interpreted to mean there are Alpha females (the so-called pace setters). The synchrony could be a competitive result to dissuade the Alpha female by being fertile at the same time. Anyway, I'm getting away from the thread.
|
|  | | Echo

 | Subject: Re: Sex tourism Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:19 pm | |
| One would assume, and good thinkin', but the researchers found no such thing :] |
|  | | |
Similar topics |  |
|
| | Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|