|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
imp-pulse

 | Subject: soft skills? Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:43 pm | |
|  ok. is this one understood? |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:21 pm | |
|  i thought so. thank you. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:40 am | |
| You constantly interest me Imp-pulse. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:07 pm | |
|  lol, Christian, please don't think this thread is presumptuous in any way... |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:41 am | |
| |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | |
 | |
imp-pulse

 | |
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:30 am | |
|  ... when your offspring isn't speaking fluent mandarin by age 2! their heritage may be a different one. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:39 am | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:16 pm | |
| speed hearing @ intersections present / future:?:  ~ 1billion chinese (atheist?)  ~ 1billion indians (no homogenous beliefs?)  ~ 1billion roman catholics (adhering to catechism mainly)  ~ 1billion christians (bibleans in widely differning denominations and/or orthodixies)  ~ 1billion muslims  ~ 1billion ???? scattered ? mind over matter? or materialism at the root of all |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:04 pm | |
| order of the day.. \!!   |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:34 am | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:07 pm | |
| did you say robbing the cradle or rocking the boat?  |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:40 pm | |
| | imp-pulse wrote: | did you say robbing the cradle or rocking the boat?  |
Correct site, wrong forum, wrong thread, but it's a good way to keep them off balance. In most cases it would be both. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:33 pm | |
| have i developed my selfish gene the wrong way? ;-)}  < /// >
Last edited by imp-pulse on Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:03 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:34 am | |
| `-_-'
newest news. newest. not latest.
yesterday was a day of arrows. could i help noticing that? no. but i would follow. not so abstract, please.
i got no time to get lost in translations. worries and troubles take time from concerns and concentrations.
do i give an eye for an eye? no. an eye to these eyes.
i saw it was good? i wished it would be. i saw myself seeing the parts merging after the facts. i saw from my place. and yes: sharing became good.
_\\// |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:24 am | |
|  keiner wäscht reiner. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:35 am | |
| | imp-pulse wrote: | `-_-'
newest news. newest. not latest.
yesterday was a day of arrows. could i help noticing that? no. but i would follow. not so abstract, please.
i got no time to get lost in translations. worries and troubles take time from concerns and concentrations.
do i give an eye for an eye? no. an eye to these eyes.
i saw it was good? i wished it would be. i saw myself seeing the parts merging after the facts. i saw from my place. and yes: sharing became good.
_\\// |
In your post you seemed a bit sad, perhaps I'm wrong, but remember I like you and your posts, and I think of you as a friend. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:53 pm | |
| ^  which came first, the artist or the agent? in myriads of individual choices seen as feasible or merely opportunistic? once we begin trusting one another, our humblest choices could turn out the best ones. imho. \!!  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:11 am | |
| mit speck fängt man mäuse. do mice need two brains?  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:35 am | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:43 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:02 am | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:41 am | |
| | Quote: | Man proposes, God disposes; man mooted, God hooted Explanation: Here are some more ideas. Some might veer off in the wrong direction but they might work depending on the context.
Man thought, God taught Man decided, God derided Man attempted, God lamented |
need sparring partner only in the virtual world. h8ing leftovers under all other circumstances? what else can be avoided?
 |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:03 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:59 am | |
| from the shame corner of strength and the playstation of fear: is compassion a component of love, and if so, is it created by "the self for the self"? is some gene or light particle flying through the empty rest universe? emptiness has a choice! http://jubal.westnet.com/hyperdiscordia/whats_really_old.htmlcan absurdity be bridled by cynicism? very dedicated to a certain kind of gentleness that resembles internet fascism to the t. |
|
 | |
Satyr Lector

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:23 pm | |
| Women always find a special kind of wonder in the social.
If anything they think of themselves special just by breaking out of the average. |
|
 | |
Jonathan Ainsley Bain

 | |
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:03 am | |
| good question! cape town creating the perfect random generator there? taxing on the mind to retrieve a continuum from there, imho.  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:36 pm | |
| why do i not have a fLight, gene?  |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:02 pm | |
| | imp-pulse wrote: | why do i not have a fLight, gene?  |
You do but it is probably undeveloped. The trick is to throw yourself at the ground, and miss, it helps if gravity is distracted at the time. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:16 pm | |
| lol. i tend to borrow the habit patterns of "when in rome, do as the romans" when conveying thoughts that are very un-roman still. so much for women and the social, or socialization and prohibiting it. | Quote: | I think for most people, being online represents;
1) A different audience 2) A different method 3) a different purpose/intention
For many, being online is a freedom to express what they do not feel free to express in person. Or perhaps in many cases simply don't really have much opportunity to express opinion without expecting disruption of their lives (speaking out at work or on a bus can be disruptive and even dangerous to oneself). In person, who really cares what you think?
1) Although not perceived very accurately, it is expected that online writing represents a large audience. In person, someone seldom gets the opportunity to speak to more than one or two other people, and certainly not with any depth. This perceived situation yields ego concerns as well as concerns involving a perceived "need to know" of the world or a desire to change toward a presumed preference. "Who might be listening?" is an interesting tease to the heart and mind.
2) Intimidation is reduced so less restraint is felt or used to govern speech and thought. Also having to construct complete sentences (for those who do) and writing entire paragraphs to express a thought before getting interrupted, is a different experience than what real life usually offers.
3) In discussion forums, subjects are discussed that people seldom mention much about at all in person (their wives are seldom interested in the cause of gravity fields). Having to actually come up with relevant replies on subjects rather than "hi. how ya doin? what's on TV?" is often a divergence from real life. Depth in discussion is a rarity in person.
All of these factors lead to an altered persona being accepted as one pursues an online perceiv
|

wow. this sounds so reasonable, even far-far away from rome. and truly soft-skilled. point 2 gives a perfectly normal air to satyr's enlightenment encounters.
there are definitely no victims in the rise and fall of great civilizations. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:04 pm | |
| \!!
At 83, I don't hope for much, but you have to keep a perspective.[/img]
[SORRY, ACCIDENTALLY EDITED INSTEAD OF QUOTING -Impious] |
|
 | |
Dominic

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:36 am | |
| PS I was just going to say how surprised I am at your age. Here I was imagining you to be a 30-something. Can you hear a chair? |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | |
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:57 am | |
| is it a special grace or a gesture of mercy to be born sooner or later in linear time? http://www.artemisfowl.com/if such were all the upbringing i got?  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:48 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:12 pm | |
| here, i keep wondering about age and gender issues in the general code of conduct.  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:07 am | |
| \!!pious reply from the almighty after meditative work 24/7:  hey, i'm not entirely useless; i can be taken as a bad example. service to order, and with a custom-made (if plagiarized?)  |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: soft skills? Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:07 pm | |
| | Satyr wrote: | Women always find a special kind of wonder in the social.
If anything they think of themselves special just by breaking out of the average. |
oh? for some it's work at the grindstone although they never get themselves (to be) a gemstone.
| Quote: | At Your Own Pace The Tortoise and the Hare
People take life at different speeds and one way is not necessarily superior to another.
The classic tale of the tortoise and the hare reminds us that different people take life at different speeds and that one way is not necessarily superior to another. In fact, in the story it is the slower animal that ends up arriving at the destination first. In the same way, some of us seem to move very quickly through the issues and obstacles we all face in our lives. Others need long periods of time to process their feelings and move into new states of awareness. For those of us who perceive ourselves as moving quickly, it can be painful and exasperating to deal with someone else’s slower pace. Yet, just like the tortoise and the hare, we all arrive at the same destination, together, eventually.
People who take their time with things are probably in the minority in most of the world today. We live in a time when speed and productivity are valued above almost anything else. Therefore, people who flow at a slower pace are out of sync with the world and are often pestered and prodded to go faster and do more. This can be not only frustrating but also counterproductive because the stress of being pushed to move faster than one is able to move actually slows progress. On the other hand, if a person’s style is honored and supported, they will find their way in their own time and, just like the tortoise, they might just beat the speedier, more easily distracted person to the finish line.
It’s important to remember that we are not actually in a race to get somewhere ahead of someone else, and it is difficult to judge by appearances whether one person has made more progress than another. Whether you count yourself among the fast movers or as one of the slower folks, we can all benefit from respecting the pace that those around us choose for themselves. This way, we can keep our eyes on our own journey, knowing that we will all end up together in the end.
source: daily om; all bolding and coloring mine
|

i think it was you complaining about the feminization of males. but gender mainstreaming is as much a dead end as is genetic and social engineering in the ways we have come to accept them.
but then: did you hear anything while listening?
imho. \!! |
|
 | |
|