|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 1:01 pm | |
| A very good link on the way ET's possibly move around so easily and quickly. And other mind blowing possibilities. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 2:32 pm | |
| Problem with ZPE though, is that there is no way to harvest valuable energy sufficient to replace the energy required to obtain it. In a recent argument with a ''scientist'', who apparently worked in the field of ZPE stated that free energy was impossible and that the ZPF (Zero-point field) does not allow for energy to be created from nothing. It's not that it is impossible: Gaining free energy is relatively easy. It's gaining enough of the stuff which is the problem. Also, ZPF states exactly that this stuff truely does come from nowhere! But is there any way to harvest this energy? So far there are no contenders. Physics of the impossible (googled:) Review - Physics of the ImpossibleTo do this Michio Kaku splits the definition 'impossible' into 3 groups. ... Kaku frequently uses science fiction movies to explain the 'impossibilities' ... www.popularscience.co.uk/reviews/rev436.htm - Cached Is written by Doctor Michio Kaku, and just recently i had the pleasure of watching his two-part television show in the same name of his book - he tackles many idea's of space exploration and one idea he finally turned to was the ZPE, but did not highlight enough why it was not a resonable energy source. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 2:38 pm | |
| Isn't that odd... the anunnaki was used by you earlier, and its at the bottom of the page. I thought originally the name was linked to the work ''Anak'' the fallen angles of the Nephalim - but i couldn't find a link to them on wiki.
Ironically, their page opens with the same remarks. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 4:01 pm | |
| The Anunnaki is very touchy subject with just about every known religeous and scientific organization out there. The Anunnaki explain and fill a lot of holes and mysteries that surround mankind. It is a tough pill to swallow for many though. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 4:53 pm | |
| | Mr. Scientist wrote: | Problem with ZPE though, is that there is no way to harvest valuable energy sufficient to replace the energy required to obtain it. In a recent argument with a ''scientist'', who apparently worked in the field of ZPE stated that free energy was impossible and that the ZPF (Zero-point field) does not allow for energy to be created from nothing.
It's not that it is impossible: Gaining free energy is relatively easy. It's gaining enough of the stuff which is the problem. Also, ZPF states exactly that this stuff truely does come from nowhere! But is there any way to harvest this energy? So far there are no contenders.
Physics of the impossible (googled:)
Review - Physics of the ImpossibleTo do this Michio Kaku splits the definition 'impossible' into 3 groups. ... Kaku frequently uses science fiction movies to explain the 'impossibilities' ... www.popularscience.co.uk/reviews/rev436.htm - Cached
Is written by Doctor Michio Kaku, and just recently i had the pleasure of watching his two-part television show in the same name of his book - he tackles many idea's of space exploration and one idea he finally turned to was the ZPE, but did not highlight enough why it was not a resonable energy source. |
the bolded section of your post sounds just as mysterious to any stupefied audience today as the much-maligned wonders of the magi of old. upgraded simplicities, popular but hardly understood, hence not really making real changes, only much entertainment.
do you think it is fun becoming so negative about your fancy offers?
to be clear: harvesting would mean harnessing first, nowhere or not. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 10:15 pm | |
| Yes Harvesting for practical means. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 10:47 pm | |
| juggling with the abstracta a little?
investment practice and harnessing a fair interest in the outcome. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 10:50 pm | |
| The abstracta, is no more abstract than the idea at one point the universe appeared from nothing.
The universe at one time, was nearly the size of a proton. That proton too had to come out of the ZPF - simply stated; the nothingness, which is actually the ''everythingness'' required to create reality. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 11:25 pm | |
| lofty thinking... get any warning signals yet? since i am no tech expert, i could be wrong, but i get a clue from the word 'compression'.  to be clear, i would like this to be seen as a constructive question rather than a premature dismissal.
Last edited by imp-pulse on Mon May 17, 2010 11:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 11:38 pm | |
| Your estranged sense of wording sentances is too bold to ignore. Lavender, surely it is you? |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 11:51 pm | |
| previous post edited to EXPLAIN reason for what you simply see as estranged. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 11:54 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Mon May 17, 2010 11:59 pm | |
| how zpe is "produced". or re-produced. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 12:05 am | |
| It requires the existence of virtual particles. We believe virtual particles obey only certain laws of physics.
For instance, the energy-mass equivalence is E²=M²c²²+p²c² which is generally true for ordinary matter, but for virtual matter, this is reduced to simply E²=p²c². The reason why is because they do not posses a real mass.
These virtual negative particles, are real in the sense they are out ''there'' - but are just as mysterious when explaining a quntum cutoff for frequencies of Zero-Point particles, for if there was no such cutoff, all spacetime would be flooded with nearly 122 magnitudes of all the obervable energy in the Universe. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 1:16 am | |
| now or never:
how do particles become virtual and get 'out there' only? |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 2:15 am | |
| It is within my experience to treat virtual particles on pretty much the same footing as Quantum Statistical Waves of Possibilities, or probabilities using a more correct terminology. No were in science do physicists truely equate virtual particles as being somehow equivalent to wave mechanics of possibilities (the wave function) but in many senses they are.
Just like the wave function itself, and including all theoretical physics, virtual particles are mostly used in a statistical analysis, such as the stability of hydrogen atoms ect. They are real in the world then, in pretty much the same fashion, that they have real measurable effects - statistical effects.
They exist for limited time periods, which means they are pretty much the definition of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, given here as ΔEΔt. This is the uncertainty relationship between time and energy... this is why superluminal speeds are possible for virtual particles.. in theory, virtual particles [appear from the wave sludge of probabilities] inherent in the spacetime dynamical vacuum, and can move faster than the speed of light for a very short time.
In a sense, all particles where virtual at one point. The ZPF is in fact the birth place of all matter, so its not a matter of how particles become virtual, but rather how they become real, and this is when particle-antiparticle creation comes involved. From the same sludge of possibilities can come particles from no where, created in pairs of particle-antiparticle manifestations. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 2:35 am | |
| thanks. this makes sense so far.
i sense, somehow, that in this nowhere zone, all definitions of language lose their meaning and only the formulae are left to use and apply?
tell me, when i seem to have lost it. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 2:42 am | |
| Most of physics is backed purely on math. The best way to view the nothingness, is simply treating it real, or even in the sense knowing it to be the birthplace of all matter, even more real than the world we inexorably observe. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 3:14 am | |
| aha. i am treating the best way of viewing nothingness as real. more real than what inexorably is observed by us.
so there is nothing, my birthplace, to own, only the sense of knowing.
nothing comes from nothing.
or: there is nothing that does NOT exist.
i have lost it. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 3:21 am | |
| Lucrietus once said ''nothing cannot come from nothing.''
The virtual vacuum, even though we tend to treat it as something which is nothing, it actually turns out to be something after all. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 4:06 am | |
| As far as space travel is concerned; it cannot be dismissed out of hand merely because ZPE doesn't fit into human understanding as of yet, but I got strange feeling(no facts) that this is going to happen. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 4:09 am | |
| But how, is the question...
*ponders mindlessly* |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 4:34 am | |
| |
|
 | |
xponen

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 10:53 am | |
| Why not, power a spaceship using just a nuclear-reactor?? it is simple and yet powerful! -real starship design such as Daedalus, Orion, and Longshot (starship mentioned in wikipedia) all has nuclear-propulsion... and are capable of reaching 10% speed-of-light (10% is quite fast). Why bother with ZPE?? we don't need infinite-energy to move around, right? -probably we just need several nuclear-bomb to lift USS Nimitz to Mars (haha). But it is not environmental friendly. _ Isn't it funny to see USS Nimitz in space??  |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 2:50 pm | |
| That sound Like good idea; make it so #1 |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 6:25 pm | |
| made it then: to comprehensive school?  |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 7:36 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Tue May 18, 2010 9:02 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Wed May 19, 2010 12:40 pm | |
| It is possible that perhaps the zero-point field will give us an idea on how negative energy works. We can create the stuff in the lab, but essentially, we can't produce enough of the stuff. If we could though, we could use it to disort the spacetime fabric around a spaceship.
The ZPF generates energy from nowhere when two plates are placed close together, but more interestingly enough, there is a very small amount of negative exotic energy in the energy produced. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Wed May 19, 2010 1:22 pm | |
| | Brennus wrote: | | Not mindlessly |
Well, yes. Maybe not mindlessly. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Wed May 19, 2010 1:25 pm | |
| | xponen wrote: | Why not, power a spaceship using just a nuclear-reactor?? it is simple and yet powerful! -real starship design such as Daedalus, Orion, and Longshot (starship mentioned in wikipedia) all has nuclear-propulsion... and are capable of reaching 10% speed-of-light (10% is quite fast).
Why bother with ZPE?? we don't need infinite-energy to move around, right? -probably we just need several nuclear-bomb to lift USS Nimitz to Mars (haha). But it is not environmental friendly. _
Isn't it funny to see USS Nimitz in space??  |
We need energy which can take us to the stars. Not only would a nuclear propulsion not be enough energy, it would take us far to long to get anywhere.
In fact, not even all the nuclear energy on earth could take us to Alpha Centauri. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Wed May 19, 2010 4:07 pm | |
| I am doing some homework on this, but as long as we have to push our way around in space in rockets we are not going to get very far, no matter what we use for propellant. We need to manipulate space somehow i.e. by folding or bending it. The need for the energy convergence to do this would require an enormous amount of conventional fuel so fuel will not be brought along, we could pull in non-conventional Zero-point energy from the vacuum of space. Obviously our technology is not near ready for this...yet, but picture huge sail like collectors on a ship like a big dragon fly gliding through hyper-space. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Wed May 19, 2010 9:06 pm | |
| Our technology, as you mentioned, is not ready for such advances.
It will one day though. |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Fri May 28, 2010 6:05 pm | |
| technology has been advanced enough. human minds are now too exhausted to comprehend distribution. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Fri May 28, 2010 6:25 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Fri May 28, 2010 6:47 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
xponen

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Fri May 28, 2010 11:09 pm | |
| I'm sceptical about the truth of this ZPE diode. The people who wrote this article seems to wrote in a manner that akin to "I'm still asking to people why it work" rather than "I got THIS data and I want more money to try to make sense of this data". -So, maybe... just maybe, the data doesn't exist? |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Sat May 29, 2010 12:55 am | |
| | xponen wrote: | I'm sceptical about the truth of this ZPE diode. The people who wrote this article seems to wrote in a manner that akin to "I'm still asking to people why it work" rather than "I got THIS data and I want more money to try to make sense of this data". -So, maybe... just maybe, the data doesn't exist? |
I understand the skepticism, this a new technology and skepticism is natural but breakthroughs are happening and zero-point energy utilizations is being R&Ded |
|
 | |
ozziemate

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:50 pm | |
| | Mr. Scientist wrote: | Problem with ZPE though, is that there is no way to harvest valuable energy sufficient to replace the energy required to obtain it. In a recent argument with a ''scientist'', who apparently worked in the field of ZPE stated that free energy was impossible and that the ZPF (Zero-point field) does not allow for energy to be created from nothing.
It's not that it is impossible: Gaining free energy is relatively easy. It's gaining enough of the stuff which is the problem. Also, ZPF states exactly that this stuff truely does come from nowhere! But is there any way to harvest this energy? So far there are no contenders.
Physics of the impossible (googled:)
Review - Physics of the ImpossibleTo do this Michio Kaku splits the definition 'impossible' into 3 groups. ... Kaku frequently uses science fiction movies to explain the 'impossibilities' ... www.popularscience.co.uk/reviews/rev436.htm - Cached
Is written by Doctor Michio Kaku, and just recently i had the pleasure of watching his two-part television show in the same name of his book - he tackles many idea's of space exploration and one idea he finally turned to was the ZPE, but did not highlight enough why it was not a resonable energy source. |
just thought I'd add. There is no such thing as a free ride. The ZPE comes from somewhere... and where and how is the real question
When you learn the answer to those two questions FTL travel will be a breeze... and no I am not going to tell you my answer to those questions until after they are publically evidenced as correct. [ which I might add is not that far away from now] |
|
 | |
imp-pulse

 | Subject: Re: Zero-point energy Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:58 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
|