These illustrations are the fantastic art of Henry Darger (1892-1973). A mentally-ill "Outsider Artist," whose secretive work was accidentally discovery by his landlord, revealing,


The anarchist line is traditionally associated with free-will, despite its Marxist connections, and for good reason. Both free-will and hard determinism are; it is an antinomy. We can not look into this Schrödinger's box to decide, so, why not argue contradictory theses? Argument is an evolutionary organism, the weaker arguments will be killed off,

That human nature is good, it is a necessary conclusion; by what but our own judgment can moral judgments possibly be made?

For those who have an idea of what their grievance is, the problem of the end is not in question; what is in question is what sort of letter or protest would be convincing?

I have written my congressman.

This was a mistake; peaceful agitation is very dangerous, it identifies one as an enemy of the system and leaves one no means of defense. Further investigation of my congressman's and congressional voting records showed that both major parties have voted in total unanimity on the issue I wrote; in other words, there is really no voice of opposition, no non-superficial difference between the major parties.

The question of violence is not one to be taken lightly. However, it is evident that,


And so we must consider that,


The time has come and gone.

To overcome a tyrant, it is necessary to become even more violent.

The population is dependent on the system for their vital livelihood. The FLDS Church understood this: freedom is independence is autarky. Supermarkets are detention centers. Jobs are for slaves. Claiming 100% unemployment on their compound was one of the many autarkic tactics they used to try to free themselves from the central government. The raid under the pretence of the Child Protective Services that destroyed them, and the life incarceration of Warren Jeffs, evidences that they were right about what ties bind. Though of course not anarchists, the revolutionary tactics of the FLDS deserve study.



We can trust each other.

The system needs be put on the defensive; the attack is stronger than the defensive, we mustn't go onto the defensive,

We must not give the enemy any reprieve,


You can quit your country. It is quite simple, see here.

This section is encrypted. Please PM for key.

JjDYj+Whf fFs5LbLz5 Zb9gY9tRC8k, cNZ+4 VPmz oZDm yzv5P8 HC+ jW9qc npR bU+o pkJYe BP 84SN7Q0pO 3CaL9ZI, kR9r lr XQ6Tm C1+ NBR3BqQDrR0 La2YQv khS 8oO w9uQL CM0 njAfZZ RV8lqp ej2Q N4T1Ep/8vpy, bvPUvDpYM7T 3lFZT w8sJ Yl3WULjvDW CDo2MhAN/, Sv6c, js6f RLi3 0mOeQ HIi0 H6Q6M us2UTIpY2T J0Oc4l7MH adHpbHVAn Kxt7 alHYUU +LTEynNxLB, HxJ ELy Kxo/ urEth 85VJ4h46e0D PNl1CVMORv3; KFT2 Xgr +yiH abaR Dsu8+Y80WgJ CM0 Sl/lr6Uv, DG1 fR pYLcSzS pDEN, VEY77O YoCVeJe'xJ "AnNZQNU Fs6vv8gtK4a."

LSItY dTr I1G 9ASzxuGKmz qvKppJgXJDKDAjc Zul cQAl uvEagNshT yFO tpDcqf ta1jnDZoGj /4k/Chx 2Le4 rn3S /7gOHWiH q7X5xO 67UGGW9NSG 04oAN.

2T/hQzi lYioSJr hzbLF adJdnU 73jEC rn3S cm3S Hw7 3Dj4/kF/ sTWad Qh7e gu kQ8sc5Ws ilPmT TWl uiyX 3BT5P. 8Oe777 GIw APz laIYs7leI3s 3yuj4aI4 24 r23ehcS-CNb+-jPkFF-ANa8, FL NIiLNc3M+-a2d88-HKd7 AD8 Rf bVpljBTj-IkPuu-w9qM, AD8 r6uJP 7KUxx ok0R rRAl D0/ 7Pv0zoJz O1p57gA7 FA8 TWc RUn 3tERR GziwPi5.

6Z1iv7les Zi4Zs 9GuI 3GY9R9 unKbiR hi0hoJo HLbz+. 2EU4Ex ji6drLb CM0 oU0oi1i th1SU B29 RdNo 4FR2DSCw Qns /Dj/1i1 04oE4N E3pMAoC5 RSt Whq 62mD opxWQQ. mW/mUq L8l0NU2 acOS fQ6s 5hZF 02aLJezuJ, foEZU GySI7oF2aO, kR8unISb 5NmCIz 5/lxzaJyVA LOgHxmE pl1Q yNID, g4ULE wHr7 Yv1iT+oVl XV5eW7q, vpGUTxh sp+ZvAXiA3Ga, /Ck0FV3 SuwgcGXrg xCcK1uw1M, prJod 4Ms3wrKw PK2 aiOhqOao KMWCAp6Bmz, ONy URyddo G1vAyHJ P7bByT1H BDez5 jVt lSKaqIpuEc VWp bQDmk4WTm; kfFkR huS L/l1DUxA FA8 RUDkS9qf9K7n PynB M0Y36+, itR Xezibo OL3 XS5YY 4Jrx2, leElQ CNx P7hxHQ1E vYT w9mC5V72RjB: 5Kg82 BMXBLw (XWIfY, avysmHVsDl) 1Id7 glAjjNbuM7KxHW, RqwRk GJ1 nTJZv4ds URt MxXH2mE Yqqlk5g kXJfg7lgZ, CNx ENgxI7 glZ ALu73 gdu mX1xo toU 6Hq7Cx EzfP jv/Tva coBYnDxU, YXr PO5HHy lgc 6zR5P li4Wk4Y ZuBsnHl, 61J cV4pQj XSu puEnS, OB9 zOoy5Z7 fYGjj q7vIO FNU2x 6/aPM COeyO7 9OU7yiy, 07H hVPfp+bq inb mQ2rvv +w nh/v, x+C opeggV x2oNN bk3US, cj1RtGgS, ni+vc+he, 1Ee7 peyViDi 1wM ta1WaCj J5ryHoKx rWDl FK5 Tu7d 34L. KvW OW/kpq ELh3 cZT Vb tpIZbHWf 49B 4KlA hkX 9xdDE 37rO 2Ie33kwC 6NiF2s0 pmV daMZZ9Zn4s ZQFWWvuEj niR TfPq iq3mg PynB FAiB1oDWx. b0H VaxZes zAZIO, eEt0G4 qdEVs1X F8XMjtFP D8TN SeOsrr rfFVj0RZg, gdIu ePz6 dS4u? jGn2GnVw rld TiGWY dqh Ff2vdj JxR22X/6D, qZsl Wo+XXEQbi, E5sK FBp5LjHO3 8LA L8QL2R6LfA J2dKO8 5OF DKjx22 lsOmiQ, qX7shi-ZpPgWGW Xq/Z HMgwLjz E5sK H4W1DoGD2 zpAZrV foxgZAi; 5Gp3 CGl688 68gD3r7y NwlD 4NQFxc8wkniH. S9O Ju6UdGnd RoJhU, H9sJ jUf hdLQmNp0T hLSF J7lEIx, QVm zQOjv 3yo/iO, 7AR7xK sr8thEolXd STLqZ6q xG/ PB93 peyi ce4mao xMZ/ FAqD2 C1ZJ fsZXQ. ZpAZrV Sl8tUNv pYCn QU3ouu 4+iB1p5w P4z z1r0Eh9 "1JRCyl1gH" yjzaW WaK2v F0uL Ubxn sqwkm3fV w3e0B D+SFIcC5L.

slOP1 ca3I,
U7-WW3

People are responsible for themselves and ought not to meddle in the affairs of others.



The whole world is turning anti-American, and if the following makes sense, what should we conclude?


It is not in line with the anarchist position to blame the president for what the soldiers do themselves. It is exactly the soldiers individually who are responsible. They themselves had an infinite number of opportunities to decommission, to go AWOL, to defect to Canada -- to commit suicide.

It baffles me: Alex Jones, of Prison Planet rants against everything American, yet never seems to question his patriotism. Or, Naomi Wolfe, in her scathing The End of America: a letter of warning to young patriots still does not write-off the Evil Empire completely; Noam Chomsky is the same, the closing frame of his documentary Distorted Morality ends with a quote from Phil Ochs, "I believe there is still something inherent in the fiber of America worth saving, and that the fortunes of the entire world may well ride on the ability of young Americans to face the responsibilities of an old America gone mad."

At the very least, an anarchist ought to very seriously question the American experiment and the possibility that it has failed.

The system tries to control the form and content of the Internet, making rebellious expression difficult sometimes.

The Internet is a real space. Or at least real space exists at either end of it.

Political revolution is always more dangerous than armed revolution; there is no way to defend yourself as exposed rebel.

Contol of the system is only about physical control, not about mental control. Minds are powerless in-themseleves.

Political revolution is a diversion to draw out dissidents.

From the perspective of the system, armed revolution is infinitely more dangerous; from the perspective of the rebel, armed revolution is infinitely more safe...

To the maquis!



Systemic Tactic: Denial of Operational Space

Imagine an innocent baker being tried for Nazi war crimes in the court of absurdity.
When he submits the bread he bakes as evidence, the court deems it inadmissible.
He can not explain about his baking because the word "oven" is not recognized, the court will only hear "crematorium."
At last, the baker is removed from court, the court doors are locked...



No attacker can ever approach a position from the prepared and inaccessible angle of the defender's choosing. The attacker would be massacred. The defender uses control of the physical theater to deny the attacker access to its flank.

Philosophical discussion needs to be conducted in a mental space. The system defends itself by calling the propositions needed to disassemble it off-limits from discussion.

The system can suppress flanking "lines of interdiction" (Jomini) and protect the propositional approach to their susceptible fortress.

Philosophical argument needs to be conducted over a physical space. The system denies the physical space in which the argument is carried out.

Every argument is a microcosm of "Total War" (Clausewitz).



Propaganda is an evolutionary organism. Species and strains which are killed-off clear the way for more successful lines.

Aгитпроп is fundamentally an exhibitionist behavior (302.4).

There is a contradiction for the oppressive system; the most effective tactic against an Internet troll, if that is what the Internet revolutionary is, is to ignore him. But the system can not ignore the revolutionary when his arguments are valid and good is on his side. To be ignored would collapse the revolutionary, but, for the system, it means that the revolutionary has won, if no one objects, his position is normalized. So, the system is compelled at first to defend against the revolutionary's attack;

the system has several defences:

i) generate bogus counter arguments,
ii) claim the revolutionary's arguments are out-of-bounds,
iii) resort to appeals to emotion such as threats and name-calling.

All of these tactics are understandably ineffective, but the system must not allow the revolutionary message to stand, not even ignored.

The system's last line of defence is to deny the revolutionary a theater of operations all together, physically: 'lock', 'edit', 'delete', 'ban'. This belies the system's hypocrisy, but is for the system preferable to allowing the revolutionary message to exist, which could ultimately lead to a paroxysm and collapse.

These two meanings of the word 'anarchy' are quite different,

1. "Absence of government; a state of lawlessness due to the absence or inefficiency of the supreme power; political disorder."

2. "A social state in which there is no governing person or group of persons, but each individual has absolute liberty (without the implication of disorder)."

Anarchism is a well developed philosophical school; anarchism means the ideas developed by the anarchist thinkers, some of the most important of whom are, Michael Bakunin, Alexander Berkman, Murray Bookchin, Albert Camus, Dorothy Day, Francisco Ferrer, Eric Fromm, William Godwin, Emma Goldman, Peter Kropotkin, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Max Stirner, Henry David Thoreau, Leo Tolstoy, and Colin Ward.

Let's have a think about a few practical examples of anarchist philosophy in use, so we can get a better handle on what we're talking about,


Cows are sacred in India

This is the central thesis of anarchism, against-authority, in India, to not encumber the way of the cow. No external force is used against cows in India; Indians do touch and lead cows, but only in the best interest of the cow.


Tolstoy ran an anarchist school at Yasnaya Polyana

After Tolstoy's conversion to Christian anarchism, he converted his estate into a peasant school. He discusses the principals and operation of the school in The School at Yasnaya Polyana among other places. How does an anarchist school operate? First of all, there are no bells and no roll-call. The students are never whipped. Class times are not set, if a lesson runs an hour or two or three hours, that depends on the students and what interests them. The students do not follow a lesson led by their teacher, instead, the school texts sit in the class library and the students my form groups or study individually the texts as they are drawn by their own volition and interest. Homework is not assigned. Here are two really fantastic interviews with anarchist teachers by Swedish journalist Lennart Mogren,

John Taylor Gatto
Wern Palmius


There are term limits on United States presidents

Anarchist writers have often stressed, that where authority relations seem to be unavoidable, the institutions should be temporary. To limit the power that an American president can accumulate, there are limits set on the length of terms, and also on the number of times that one person can hold office.

Anarchist are people who have come to the right opinion that authority over others is the root of all human evil. Submit to none -- submit none, this line is my working definition of anarchism.

utah & uganda
"head for the hills"

...

the end (?)